Paris meeting marks end to Obama’s failed Mideast diplomacy
Associated Press/Ynetnews/January 13/17
Analysis: With Secretary of State John Kerry admittedly only attending the conference out of a sense of obligation and real expectations for a breakthrough in peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians coming from the conference all but nonexistent, Obama’s forays into peacemaking in the Middle East end in defeat. With a shift in policy expected from the incoming Trump administration, both sides of the conflict are bracing for changes.The Obama administration’s eight years of unsuccessful Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy will come to a crashing end this weekend, with chances for a Mideast peace deal at perhaps their lowest ebb in a generation. A Paris peace conference attended by Secretary of State John Kerry isn’t expected to produce any tangible progress.
At a time when President-elect Donald Trump’s administration is promising a fundamental shift toward Israel, the State Department said Kerry was only participating in the French-hosted event to ensure America’s interest in a two-state solution to the conflict is preserved. The blunt statement reinforced the dwindling hopes for a diplomatic breakthrough. Kerry “feels obliged to be there because we have an interest in advancing a two-state solution, and we also have an interest in ensuring that whatever happens in this conference is constructive and balanced,” department spokesman Mark Toner said.
No one expects a plan to emerge that could lead to new Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. While more than 70 countries are attending, though neither Israel nor the Palestinians, the US is primarily focused on shielding the Jewish state from unfair criticism and ensuring concerns about Palestinian incitement to violence aren’t ignored. But the administration may find its voice ignored. While the US received credit from close allies in Europe and elsewhere for abstaining from a December UN Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, America’s partners have grown tired with its leadership on the peace process. Obama’s efforts in 2009-2010 and 2013-2014 both failed.
But Kerry and other administration officials fear an even worse scenario emerging: the incoming Trump administration moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and ending Washington’s longstanding opposition to Israeli settlements on land claimed by the Palestinians.
The embassy relocation would be the symbolic gesture. Trump and his choice to be ambassador to Israel have telegraphed the commitment, which would ostensibly recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital after decades of insisting that the city’s status must be determined by direct negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians. A shift on settlements could prove more dramatic, making a Palestinian state all but impossible to cobble together.
Kerry’s biggest decision in Paris may be a political one: whether to sign the concluding document if it includes a specific warning to Trump against moving the embassy. The Palestinians, Arab nations and others are pushing the issue, fearing the US move could spark a new conflagration in an already inflamed region. French officials say the warning could be in the document. Kerry’s signature would be a shot across the bow of Trump’s foreign policy and further undercut President Barack Obama’s promises for a smooth transition of power. Republicans and even many Democratic lawmakers reacted angrily to the administration’s UN vote in December and a subsequent speech by Kerry on the Israeli-Palestinian impasse. The House of Representatives even condemned the Security Council resolution. Israel is bracing for a new US policy. On Friday, the West Bank settlers’ council said it will send a delegation to Trump’s presidential inauguration next week after receiving an invitation.
In his Senate confirmation hearing this week, Trump’s choice to succeed Kerry as secretary of state, former Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson, voiced support for a two-state solution. But he said it may be unrealistic. The sides haven’t even negotiated indirectly since the process Kerry led collapsed in 2014. Given the stalemate and the US changes that may be coming, even preserving the concept of two states—Israel and Palestine—living side-by-side and in peace could prove difficult. Nevertheless, the Paris conference aims to make that a priority.
In a clear message to Israel and the Trump administration, the dozens of countries attending are expected to reiterate their opposition to Israelis settlements and call for Palestine’s establishment as “the only way” to ensure peace in the region.
A draft of the final communiqué statement obtained by The Associated Press urges Israel and the Palestinians “to officially restate their commitment to the two-state solution.” It tells Israel that no changes to its pre-1967 borders will be recognized if the Palestinians aren’t in agreement. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ruled out a return to Israel’s 1967 lines, and many members of his coalition oppose Palestinian independence. He also has derided the Paris get-together, claiming it is “rigged” against his country.